First off both speeches were very well written and that is
what you should expect from people in their position. Both of the speeches I though
possibly lacked in ethos what I really got as far as ethos for both Michelle
and Ann was that they have experience, but maybe people in their position that’s
all they need to be credible. It’s not like these are two average Americans
talking about what it take to run the county well. These lady’s husbands have
been around the block a few times per say. So I believe that they themselves as
moms and ladies in their position are credible enough. Both Michelle Obama and
Ann Romney had a ton of pathos. I think in speeches like this that is the key. If
you want voters I think you have to get them on an emotional level. Both of
them said things like it is a great country and that they are average Americans
just like us I think saying these things hit people on an emotional level
because most everyone that is voting, and that is who they are trying to get
with these speeches, loves America, also likes living here. Both of the women
both talked about their husbands and how much they love them, as well they
talked about how their husbands got to the position that they are in because of
hard work, not taking the easy way and maybe doing things that we considered “too
hard” because it was the right thing to do. What American doesn’t like that? Both
women didn’t have too much logos. Ann Romney I know stated that Romney improved
unemployment in Massachusetts. It was hard to watch both of these speeches without
bias and to take it for what it is without thinking in the back of your mind “that’s
total bullshit.” But I do think both of them did present their points very
well.
No comments:
Post a Comment